C.6 A sample implementation strategy
In general, the impact of current weaknesses on IT
service quality should determine priorities. For example, if User
services are less affected by 'real' errors than those that arise from poor
implementation of Changes, Change
Management should have priority. While each organisation should therefore
set its own priorities, the following phased approach may be used as a starting
point:
C.6.1 Phase 1:
- determine the baseline
- start with an assessment to determine priorities.
C.6.2 Phase 2:
- survey the services/system(s) currently used by the organisation for providing
day-to-day User
support and for handling Incidents,
Problems
and Known
Errors
- review the support tools used, and the interfaces to Change Management and
Configuration
Management, including inventory management, and the operational use of
the current system within the IT
provider; identify strengths to be retained, and weaknesses to be eliminated
- identify and review the agreements in place between service providers and
Customers.
C.6.3 Phase 3:
C.6.4 Phase 4:
- extend the Incident
control system in order to allow other domains, such as Computer Operations
and Network Control staff, to log Incidents directly
- negotiate and set up SLAs.
C.6.5 Phase 5:
- develop the management reporting system.
C.6.6 Phase 6:
This six-phased approach reduces the development overhead experienced at any
given time for the four IT
infrastructure management systems under consideration (Incident
Management, Problem Management, Change
Management and Configuration Management). It should, nevertheless, be noted
that, although busy sites will appreciate this smoothing of the development
bulge, the approach will increase the overall time scale for implementation.