C.6 A sample implementation strategy
In general, the impact of current weaknesses on IT 
  service quality should determine priorities. For example, if User 
  services are less affected by 'real' errors than those that arise from poor 
  implementation of Changes, Change 
  Management should have priority. While each organisation should therefore 
  set its own priorities, the following phased approach may be used as a starting 
  point:
C.6.1 Phase 1:
- determine the baseline
- start with an assessment to determine priorities.
C.6.2 Phase 2:
  - survey the services/system(s) currently used by the organisation for providing 
    day-to-day User 
    support and for handling Incidents, 
    Problems 
    and Known 
    Errors
- review the support tools used, and the interfaces to Change Management and 
    Configuration 
    Management, including inventory management, and the operational use of 
    the current system within the IT 
    provider; identify strengths to be retained, and weaknesses to be eliminated
- identify and review the agreements in place between service providers and 
    Customers.
C.6.3 Phase 3:
C.6.4 Phase 4:
  - extend the Incident 
    control system in order to allow other domains, such as Computer Operations 
    and Network Control staff, to log Incidents directly
- negotiate and set up SLAs.
C.6.5 Phase 5:
- develop the management reporting system.
C.6.6 Phase 6:
This six-phased approach reduces the development overhead experienced at any 
  given time for the four IT 
  infrastructure management systems under consideration (Incident 
  Management, Problem Management, Change 
  Management and Configuration Management). It should, nevertheless, be noted 
  that, although busy sites will appreciate this smoothing of the development 
  bulge, the approach will increase the overall time scale for implementation.
 
