6.5 Planning and implementation
6.5.1 Timing and planning
Timing and planning are important because:
  - Good Problem Management relies to a great extent 
    on an implemented and efficient Incident Management 
    process. So it is sensible to implement Problem Management either in parallel 
    with, or after Incident Management processes.
- If resources are scarce, it is advisable to concentrate in the first instance 
    on the implementation of Problem 
    and error control (reactive Problem Management). When these activities reach 
    maturity, resources can be directed to proactive Problem Management. The quality 
    of proactive Problem Management depends largely on successful implementation 
    of service monitoring activities and the base data thereby captured.
- Smaller organisations can introduce reactive Problem Management by focusing 
    daily on the 'top ten' Incidents 
    of the previous day. This can prove to be effective, since experience shows 
    that 20% of Problems cause 80% of service degradation!
6.5.2 Key success factors
Points to consider include:
  - An effective automated registration of Incidents, 
    with an effective classification, is fundamental for the success of Problem 
    Management.
- Setting achievable objectives and making use of the Problem-solving 
    talents of existing staff is a key activity. Consider 'part-time' Problem 
    Management, whereby staff set aside periods when they will look at Problems 
    away from the daily fire-fighting pressures.
- In view of the potentially conflicting interests between Incident 
    Management and Problem Management (paragraph 6.3.1), good cooperation 
    between both processes is essential. Both also have enormous synergy, which 
    can help. Support staff, often involved in both processes, should be aware 
    of the importance of balancing activities between the two.
6.5.3 Risks
The benefits of Problem Management can be weakened 
  by:
  - Absence of a good Incident 
    control process, and thus the absence of detailed historical data on Incidents 
    (necessary for the correct identification of Problems).
- Failure to link Incident records with Problem/error records, means a failure 
    to gain many of the potential benefits. This is a key feature in moving from 
    reactive support to a more planned and proactive support approach.
- Lack of management commitment, so that support staff (usually also involved 
    with reactive Incident control activities) cannot allocate sufficient time 
    to structural Problem-solving activities.
- The undermining of the Service Desk 
    role. Problem Management staff should accept support requests only from authorised 
    sources. Difficulties will arise if the process deals with requests from many 
    sources since multiple reports of Incidents with the same cause may not be 
    interpreted in the same way.
- Failure to set aside time to build and maintain the knowledge base will restrict the delivery of benefits.
- An inability to determine accurately the business impact of Incidents and 
    Problems. Consequently the business-critical Incidents and Problems are not 
    given the correct priority.
   
    |  |  |  | 
 
